“Living in Your Imagination”: A Conversation About Filmmaking with Durga Chew-Bose
How the acclaimed writer stepped behind the camera for her first film, “Bonjour Tristesse.”
- Written by: Ross Scarano
- Images/Photos Courtesy Of: Babe Nation Films

For the first ten minutes of Bonjour Tristesse, the debut feature film from writer and former SSENSE editor-in-chief Durga Chew-Bose, the protagonist Cécile says not a word. In the sunshine and languor of summertime on the French Riviera, the characters around her engage in playful conversation but the audience doesn’t have access to the protagonist. We watch Cécile, played by newcomer Lily McInerny, from a distance. We watch—how she wears her bathing suit, her posture, how she cues up a song on her phone—and we wait.

Lily McInerny, Chloë Sevigny, and Claes Bang (photo by Giacomo Bernasconi).

Lily McInerny and Chloë Sevigny (photo by Thaïs Despont).
An adaptation of the sensational 1954 coming-of-age novel by Françoise Sagan, written when she was still a teen, Bonjour Tristesse began as a screenwriting project for Chew-Bose. Years later the producers who had initially tapped her to write the script had an idea: Would she want to direct? “They felt that my approach and my vision was that of a director,” she said, explaining that her script was unorthodox and much more visual than the average screenplay. The level of detail—about camera movement, production design, and costuming—was her “unintentional preparation” to step behind the camera.
The intimate, 30-day shoot in Cassis, in the south of France, brought together an intimate crew to tell a story of jealousy and family, centered around a teen girl, her widower father, and the two women in his orbit. McInerny plays Cécile and Chloë Sevigny plays Anne, an old friend of Cécile’s late mother who is on the brink of becoming something more.
After premiering at the Toronto International Film Festival last year, Bonjour Tristesse is in theaters beginning May 1.
From her home in Montreal, Chew-Bose spoke about becoming a filmmaker on the set of her first film, collaborative ingenuity, and what she loves about her critics.
This interview has been edited and condensed for clarity.

Durga Chew-Bose (photo by Jessica Forde).
Ross Scarano
Durga Chew-Bose
Through your career as a writer and journalist you’ve built relationships with filmmakers, and I was wondering who you sought out for advice.
I had met Olivier Assayas when I had been writing about Personal Shopper. We had struck up a friendship and we’d email once in a while. And when I told him I was adapting Bonjour Tristesse, he was really excited and he was someone that through various processes of making the film, I would touch base with him or show him a cut. I was desperate to work with his longtime production designer François-Renaud Labarthe, so I was really excited to tell [Assayas] that we got him. He actually said something really wonderful to me that I’ll hold on to forever. When our film didn’t get into Cannes, I naively thought we had a chance and so I was really disappointed. In retrospect, that was really silly. So he wrote me this email after and he was explaining to me the spirit of the film and how he’s not worried about it finding its people. He said that he has learned that “movies make their own friends.” I held onto that because it was such a simple but beautiful way to express what it is to make art, to not seek being universal, and to know that if you’ve stayed true to your voice, the same way we meet our own friends, we will find our people and cultivate that world.
Janicza [Bravo] was someone I would text if I had casting ideas and she had worked with an actor or something or knew of them. I had a very long call with Lena Dunham about casting and actors, and she’s so generous with her own experience, but also she’s quite firm and funny at the same time. I was going into making my first film with a lot of nerves and her confidence in me was a relief. She was talking to me as a peer, but I hadn’t even made a film yet.
I remember we went to scout and I was messaging with Janicza and I was like, “We’re going on a scout; I guess it’s real.” She wrote me back immediately and was like, “Durga, a scout is real.” These little affirmations that I wasn’t living in the clouds. Making a movie can make you feel like you’re living in your imagination and nothing is real until there’s an audience.
I remember reading in Susan Sontag’s biography that she was in her mid-30s when she directed her first movie. She got to set and could not figure out how to communicate with the actors in a way that translated what was in her head into their bodies and voices. I’m curious how you found your communication style.
I relate to that anecdote. I would say that was one of the hardest things for me. It was hard because it came from this incredible place of respect for what actors do and knowing that there’s so many ways you can ruin quickly their space if you talk too much, if you use too many words, if you overcomplicate a simple feeling, or if you contradict yourself. You’re asking them to come for a very short period of time and be extremely vulnerable. My writing style is a bit mannered, which is an obstacle in and of itself when you’re working with an actor. I think I learned very quickly though that once you cast, the character belongs to them.
Cécile’s looking to the adults around her, especially the adult women, for models of how to be, and I was wondering how that played out behind the scenes in the sense of Lily looking to Chloë and the other adult women around her.
I think that every day on set for Lily had moments of, “I cannot believe I have a scene with Chloë.” And that energized her and added a certain voltage to her performance because there was this whole meta relationship happening alongside the actual relationship between Cécile and Anne. I remember one day Chloë got a set bag for Lily: a colorful basket that wasn’t floppy; it was solid, so when she put her script in it and water bottle and hat and sunglasses, it was sturdy. And Lily was over the moon, not only because it’s a gift from Chloë, but also the practicality of not having a flimsy bag when you have your paper script. It was so emblematic of Chloë because she’s impossibly stylish and impossibly cool, but incredibly practical and believes in function and efficiency. I was like, Lily’s going to remember this moment forever.


Lily and Aliocha by Jessica Forde
The story about the bag reminds me of the scene in the film where Chloë-as-Anne graciously and vulnerably explains her feelings about art and process. It’s one of the highlights of the movie and also doesn’t quite feel like it fits into the story. This artist talking about being an artist is not really the thrust of the movie. I was also watching it thinking, when was the last time I watched a movie depicting a female artist in a thoughtful way where she talks about her process but that wasn’t explicitly about gender or identity.
Yeah, it’s true. Those scenes, they’re more popular in biopics because they require it. It was always really important to me to find Anne’s vulnerability in her artistry, not just in her relationship to a man or potential motherhood or being in a different stage in her life. In the book she’s a fashion designer, but in my mind she was always an artist and in some ways that traps her—because it’s a career. It’s a rise in the ranks that might make you deliberate on life and make choices that exclude a family. You have to protect yourself and your vision and it can create outwardly a personality that people might not consider to be super warm. So I also wanted that scene to kind of expose what she’s like when she’s with her sketchbook. Writing it, I remember thinking, I want moments where Cécile can say one thing and it will affect Anne because she’s still an artist at the core and artists are so sensitive.
The roses line.
The roses. I don’t even know what I meant by that line, but every time I see it I’m like, “Oh God, that’s so embarrassing.” Because Cécile’s probably thinking roses are corny or so obvious, and it's just instinctive for Anne. Those are moments in life when they happen to me or I see them happening to other people, I think there’s been an earthquake. I’m happy you liked that scene because I know it’s not for everyone.
There’s a scene that jumped out to me: the conversation between Anne and Raymond, Cécile’s father, and they’re talking about memory and love. But instead of watching the conversation you watch them make a bed. Was this something you found in the edit or had you planned it that way?
That was written as two separate scenes. The dialogue of that scene was written to happen after Anne and Raymond get together, and she’s on a terrace outside and he’s doing his ballet exercises, and they’re together. They’re in love, but for whatever reason, she decides to bring up that she misses Elsa, because she misses this other woman around. This other woman provided a seductive quality, like some kind of tremor in the household. And then the bed-making scene also happens after they’re together. But that’s not where it is sequentially now in the film. Multiple things happened. For financial reasons, in preproduction we had to cut a lot of scenes. And one night I was with my AD and my line producer, and my AD said, “Why don’t you have that conversation play over the bed-making scene because it’s in the same time period of the plot?” You know how sometimes someone suggests something and your ego is upset because it’s a better idea than what you had? I was thrilled because I felt like, “Oh, he knows me now. This sounds like something I would do.”
Then, when we were in the edit, my friend Chris Wells was having a pacing issue. And he was like, what if you move the bed-making scene to before they’re together officially, because making a bed has its own innuendo? So I can’t take credit for anything you just asked me, but I will take credit for listening to them.

Lily McInerny (photo by Miyako Bellizzi).
A virtue of watching a movie on my laptop is that I can pause. And so I have to ask: Are all the books in the movie fictionalized creations of the production department?
Yeah [laughs]. In a world where the characters read a lot, especially as a way to spend time with each other, I didn’t want to focus to be, “Is Cécile reading the new Sally Rooney book?” I really wanted to create a hermetically sealed-off world that felt familiar but was hard to pin. Making sure the books weren’t real was important. My friend Teddy Blanks, the designer who did all our titles, and Molly Young, his wife who is also a brilliant and funny writer and critic, did the covers. I sent him an email with the character bios, who they are and what kind of books they might read, and I had some titles, because I’m a bit of a control freak. To Molly and Teddy’s credit, they went to town: the backs of the books have blurbs and descriptions. There are Easter Eggs. The book that Cécile is reading is called Claudia Claudia by a writer Valentina something—those are both like Monica Vitti characters.
In other interviews you’ve talked about your love for Nathalie Richard and her character, and there’s something amusing and even ironic about her first appearance. She’s negging young people for their inability to tell a story. And I was wondering what she would think of this languid movie that’s not super interested in plot.
I was taking the piss out of me. I’m very confident in the writing I want to do and the worlds I want to build as a filmmaker, but I’m also very aware of how they piss people off and they invite a lot of criticism. I’m actually kind of fascinated by how angry my movie or my writing make people. And I find there’s a level of mischief in me that finds that interesting. So in some ways, I wrote Nathalie as my ultimate film character, because she represents my favorite character and so many of my favorite films that is in a film for five minutes, but completely changes the course of things. But also, she’s negging me.
I wrote that line as a way to make fun of myself and maybe as a defense mechanism to make clear that I see it all. I understand why this type of storytelling upsets people, and yet I adore Nathalie. I love my critics. I agree with them often. You can agree with your worst qualities and you’re still gonna never change, maybe. It is myself bullying myself. I’m not into self-deprecation; it’s [more] like sparring with myself. I don’t know. I think it’s good to be an artist and be stubborn.
- Written by: Ross Scarano
- Images/Photos Courtesy Of: Babe Nation Films
- Date: April 29, 2025

